The Memetics of Beauty
Memetics of Beauty

In the quest to define beauty, the realms of art and science often appear as disparate entities. However, the emerging theories of Aristophilian web design, the Systems Complexity Axiom (SCA), and Maximum Memetic Diversity (MMD) offer a fascinating intersection where these worlds converge, providing a compelling scientific argument for the objectivity of beauty.

The Essence of Aristophilian Design

At the heart of Aristophilian web design lie the principles of symmetry, order, sameness, perception, culture, and art. These elements work in harmony to create a visual language that speaks to a universal understanding of beauty. Aristophilian web design posits that true beauty, while subject to individual perception, is rooted in certain fundamental qualities that resonate across cultural and temporal boundaries.

The Scientific Backbone: Systems Complexity Axiom

The SCA posits that increasingly complex systems require increasingly selective building blocks. For instance, a diverse range of materials may suffice for a simple structure like a one-story house, but a skyscraper demands the strongest materials for its foundation. This principle, applied to design and art, suggests an inverse relationship between the complexity of a creation and the diversity of its foundational elements. In the context of art and design, this translates to a reliance on fundamental, time-tested principles of beauty to support more complex and sophisticated works.

Maximum Memetic Diversity and the Objectivity of Beauty

MMD theory delves deeper, exploring the concept of memetic diversity — the variations in cultural expressions or “memes.” This theory contends that the complexity of a cultural expression (epimemetic complexity) limits memetic diversity. Applying this to art, one can argue that periods of high cultural sophistication, like the Renaissance and Enlightenment, showcased a dramatic increase in epimemetic complexity, resulting in art that continues to captivate globally. These eras are characterized by a profound understanding and application of foundational artistic principles, contrasting starkly with the simplicity of “modern” art, which MMD theory critiques for its intellectual regression.

Renaissance and Enlightenment: Beacons of Objective Beauty

The Renaissance and Enlightenment periods exemplify the zenith of artistic complexity and sophistication. Their artworks didn’t just capture the European soul but transcended geographical and cultural boundaries, enchanting viewers worldwide. These eras leveraged the principles of Aristophilian web design, employing symmetry, order, and cultural depth, thereby achieving a universal appeal that modern art struggles to replicate.

Modern Art and the Question of Regression

MMD theory posits an intriguing perspective on modern art, likening it to Neolithic cave paintings in its simplicity and lack of sophistication. This comparison challenges the notion of modern art as progressive, instead suggesting a regression to more primitive forms of expression. The similarity of modern art with ancient artworks, in terms of memetic simplicity, undermines its claim to intellectual and aesthetic advancement.

Concluding Thoughts: Embracing Objective Beauty

The exploration of Aristophilian web design, SCA, and MMD offers a compelling case for the existence of objective beauty. By understanding and applying these principles, we can discern why certain artworks transcend time and culture, captivating a global audience. This journey into the heart of beauty reveals that the true essence of art lies not in subjective interpretation alone but in its adherence to universal principles that resonate with our innate sense of aesthetic harmony. As we continue to explore and understand these dynamics, we pave the way for a richer, more profound appreciation of beauty in all its forms.


9am – 5pm ET
Monday – Friday